BUSINESS TRIAL LAWYERS

The Maloney Firm represents clients in trials, arbitrations and appeals in state and federal courts, and also regularly counsels clients on a wide range of business matters delivering cost-effective solutions for their legal needs.

 

Clients of The Maloney Firm receive expertise in and outside of court, even when up against larger, national firms. Always looking out for its clients’ best interests, The Maloney Firm provides significant expertise without significant cost.


Latest News

AI Models Cannot Think Like a Lawyer—Or at All Nov 13, 2025

Attorneys are submitting briefs to courts containing fabricated case citations, fabricated quotations, and entirely invented legal authorities. These are not just careless mistakes or isolated incidents. They are the predictable result of delegating critical legal work to artificial intelligence systems that their vendors claim are reliable but demonstrably are not. In Noland v. Land of […]

Learn more...
In California, Inactive Attorneys Cannot Be Arbitrators, But Disbarred Attorneys Can Oct 23, 2025

Attorneys looking to transition their career into private mediation or arbitration will still need to maintain their active State Bar licenses, according to a recent ruling by the California Court of Appeal. Getzels v. State Bar of California, 2025 No. B338089 (Cal. Ct. App., 2d Dist., Div. 4, June 26, 2025) reinforces California’s regulatory approach […]

Learn more...
Why You Should Calculate Attorney’s Fees With Care Jul 30, 2025

Even experienced trial courts can err when calculating attorney’s fees. The Court of Appeal’s reversal in Tidrick v. FCA US LLC, 2025 WL 1234567 (Cal. Ct. App. [4th Dist., Div. 3]) underscores that proper attorney fee calculations protect the integrity of fee-shifting statutes and the rights of prevailing parties to recover reasonable compensation. Moreover, fee […]

Learn more...
Court of Appeal to Parties: Ignore Local Court Deadlines, If You Must Jul 17, 2025

A recent California Court of Appeal decision potentially undermines the motion reservation systems of local courts. In CFP BDA, LLC v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. July 10, 2025) the Fourth Appellate District ruled that local court rules for timely filing after motion reservation cannot prevent a timely filed summary judgment motion from being heard, […]

Learn more...
California Courts Split on Standards for Across-the-Board Attorney Fee Reductions  Jun 20, 2025

A recent California Court of Appeal decision has deepened a split among state appellate courts regarding how trial courts must justify substantial percentage reductions to attorney fee awards. The May 2025 ruling in Michael Cash v. County of Los Angeles, _Cal. App. 5th ___ (2025) [WL 1540542; Case No. B336980], underscores issues that may impact […]

Learn more...
California Supreme Court Extends Time to Sue Opposing Counsel May 08, 2025

In Escamilla v. Vannucci 2025 Cal. LEXIS 439 (Cal. Mar. 20, 2025), the California Supreme Court weighed in on the question of how long non-clients have to sue attorneys for professional misconduct (e.g., malicious prosecution). This decision has implications for businesses who have been targeted by frivolous lawsuits, as well as attorneys who might find […]

Learn more...